Vivo X300 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 Pro: Best Camera Phone in India 2025 – Complete Comparison
Introduction
Vivo X300 Pro and Oppo Find X9 Pro are currently the two best camera smartphones available in India. If you’re planning to buy a premium camera phone in 2025, this detailed comparison will help you make the right decision.
Both phones come with flagship-grade camera hardware, powerful processors, and premium build quality. However, there are significant differences in camera processing, battery life, software experience, and overall performance that matter for long-term usage.
In this article, you’ll find a complete breakdown of design, camera performance (daylight, low-light, portrait, zoom), battery life, display quality, gaming performance, and software features. Whether you’re a photography enthusiast or someone looking for a balanced flagship phone, this comparison covers everything you need to know.
Key Specifications at a Glance
| Feature | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Display | LTPO AMOLED, 1.5K Resolution, 2000 nits | LTPO AMOLED, 1.5K Resolution, 1800 nits |
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Main Camera | 50MP (LYT 828) + 50MP Ultrawide + 200MP Periscope (HPB) | 50MP (LYT 828) + 50MP Ultrawide + 200MP Periscope (HP5) |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Battery | 6510mAh | 7500mAh |
| Charging | 90W Wired | 80W Wired |
| Software | Origin OS (5+7 years updates) | ColorOS (5+6 years updates) |
| Special Features | Dual Action Button, 8K Video, Camera Kit | Action Button, Camera Control Button, Camera Kit |
| Price (India) | ₹89,999 onwards | ₹99,999 onwards |
Design & Build Quality
Both smartphones feature premium flagship designs, but they take different approaches.
Vivo X300 Pro continues with its signature circular camera module design. While it looks familiar to Vivo users, the camera bump is noticeably thick. When placed on a flat surface, the phone sits at an incline, and the camera module remains quite visible even in your pocket.
Oppo Find X9 Pro brings a more modern and refreshing design language. The camera module is flatter, making the phone sit more evenly on surfaces. It feels less bulky overall.
Both phones include an action button similar to iPhone’s implementation. However, Vivo offers an advantage – you can assign two actions to the same button (like torch and ring/vibrate toggle). Oppo counters this with a dedicated camera control button, similar to iPhone’s camera control feature.
Haptic Feedback: Oppo’s haptic motor feels stronger and more refined.
Speakers: Vivo delivers better speaker output in terms of clarity and loudness.
Fingerprint Scanner: Both use ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanners, which is the best technology available currently.
Display Quality
Both phones feature premium LTPO AMOLED panels with 1.5K resolution, offering excellent visual quality for content consumption and photography.
| Display Aspect | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Brightness | 2000 nits | 1800 nits |
| Panel Type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1.5K | 1.5K |
| HDR Playback | Excellent | Very Good |
During outdoor photography sessions, Vivo’s slightly higher brightness (2000 nits vs 1800 nits) makes a noticeable difference. HDR content playback is also slightly better on Vivo with brighter highlights and better contrast.
For everyday usage, both displays are excellent and you won’t notice major differences indoors.
Performance & Gaming
Both smartphones are powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processor with identical RAM and storage configurations. Benchmark scores are nearly identical, and both handle demanding apps effortlessly.
Gaming Performance Test
| Game | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Genshin Impact (30 min) | 59.2 avg FPS | 51.9 avg FPS |
| Wuthering Waves (30 min) | 49.5 avg FPS | 45.4 avg FPS |
| Temperature | Higher | Lower |
Vivo’s Approach: Aggressive performance tuning for maximum FPS, even at the cost of higher temperatures.
Oppo’s Approach: Conservative tuning that prioritizes thermal management and battery efficiency over raw performance.
For casual gamers, both phones handle BGMI and COD Mobile without issues. However, for demanding games like Genshin Impact, Vivo delivers noticeably smoother gameplay despite running hotter.
Camera Performance
This is where both phones truly shine and where the real competition lies. Both feature a 50MP + 50MP + 200MP triple camera setup.
Camera Hardware Comparison
| Camera | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main Sensor | 50MP LYT 828 | 50MP LYT 828 (Same) |
| Ultrawide | 50MP | 50MP (Same sensor size, slightly advanced on Oppo) |
| Periscope | 200MP Samsung HPB (Larger sensor) | 200MP Samsung HP5 (Smaller sensor) |
| Optical Zoom | 3.5x | 3x |
Vivo’s periscope lens uses a larger flagship-grade sensor, which theoretically captures better low-light telephoto shots.
Daylight Photography
Detail: Oppo captures more detail by default because it shoots at 50MP resolution. Vivo defaults to 12MP (binned). You can enable 50MP mode on Vivo, but it takes slightly longer to process.
HDR Performance: Vivo remains the king of HDR photography. While Oppo has improved significantly, Vivo delivers more consistent highlight control and dynamic range across various lighting conditions.
Low-Light Photography
| Aspect | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Shadow Recovery | Better | Good |
| Highlight Control | Excellent | Good |
| Consistency | More consistent | Occasional variations |
Vivo handles low-light scenarios better, especially in controlling highlights from hoardings, streetlights, and neon signs.
Portrait Photography
Vivo has been the portrait photography leader for years, and this continues with the X300 Pro.
35mm-50mm Focal Length: Oppo delivers sharper details while Vivo applies slight smoothening. Some users prefer this skin-smoothing effect, but photography purists might prefer Oppo’s natural output.
Periscope Portraits: Vivo’s larger sensor produces better detail and more cinematic bokeh at longer focal lengths.
Blur Styles: Vivo offers multiple artistic blur effects (dramatic, natural, cinematic), making portraits more versatile.
Macro Photography
Oppo can focus closer to subjects, which is advantageous for extreme close-ups. However, Vivo’s larger sensor produces more cinematic macro shots with better background separation.
Zoom Performance
| Zoom Range | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 10x-30x | Better detail retention | AI smoothening visible after 10x |
| Usability | More natural | Slight processing artifacts |
For practical zoom photography (10x to 30x range), Vivo performs better with cleaner output and less aggressive AI processing.
Color Processing Philosophy
Vivo: Vibrant, punchy colors with boosted saturation and contrast. Very consistent processing across different scenarios.
Oppo: More natural color reproduction but can sometimes produce flat colors, inconsistent white balance, or over-saturated images in certain conditions.
Degree of Failure: When Vivo fails, it usually means slightly over-saturated or high-contrast images. When Oppo fails, it can affect multiple parameters – white balance, contrast, and saturation simultaneously. This makes Vivo more predictable and reliable.
Video Recording
| Feature | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 4K 120fps | Yes | Yes |
| 8K Recording | Yes | No |
| Portrait Video 4K 60fps | Yes | No (Only 4K 30fps) |
| Lens Switching | Smoother | Slightly jerky |
| Backlit HDR | Good | Slightly better |
Vivo offers more video features and smoother lens transitions, making it better for content creators.
Camera Kits Comparison
Both brands now offer optional camera kits for enhanced photography.
| Aspect | Vivo Camera Kit | Oppo Camera Kit |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹10,000 cheaper | More expensive |
| Tripod Mount | Not included | Included |
| Lens Attachment | Other cameras remain accessible | Other cameras get blocked |
| Zoom Results | Better (larger sensor) | Good |
Vivo’s kit is more functional for daily use, while Oppo’s kit offers better tripod compatibility.
Battery Life & Charging
This is where Oppo takes a clear lead.
| Aspect | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 6510mAh | 7500mAh |
| Charging Speed | 90W | 80W |
| Full Charge Time | 50 minutes 12 seconds | 1 hour 15 minutes |
Despite Vivo’s faster charging, Oppo’s nearly 1000mAh larger battery provides significantly better endurance. No amount of software optimization can compensate for this hardware advantage.
For users who prioritize all-day battery life, Oppo Find X9 Pro is the clear winner.
Software & Updates
| Aspect | Vivo X300 Pro (Origin OS) | Oppo Find X9 Pro (ColorOS) |
|---|---|---|
| Update Policy | 5 Android + 7 Security years | 5 Android + 6 Security years |
| Stability | Some bugs present | Very stable |
| Smoothness | Good, needs optimization | Excellent |
| AI Features | Comprehensive | Comprehensive |
Origin OS has improved significantly and offers rich features, but during testing, occasional bugs were noticeable. The software needs more refinement.
ColorOS remains smoother, more stable, and better optimized for daily usage. For users who prioritize a bug-free experience, Oppo’s software is more reliable currently.
Pros & Cons
Vivo X300 Pro
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best-in-class HDR photography | Thicker camera module |
| Superior portrait modes | Higher gaming temperatures |
| Better video features (8K, 4K 60fps portrait) | Origin OS has minor bugs |
| Larger periscope sensor | Smaller battery (6510mAh) |
| Longer update policy | Slight skin smoothening at 35-50mm |
| Better speakers |
Oppo Find X9 Pro
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Massive 7500mAh battery | Smaller periscope sensor |
| Modern, flatter design | Inconsistent color processing sometimes |
| Stable ColorOS experience | No 8K video recording |
| Camera control button | Portrait video limited to 4K 30fps |
| Better haptics | Higher price point |
| 50MP default for more detail | Gaming performance slightly lower |
Comparison with Competitors
| Feature | Vivo X300 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Pro | Samsung S24 Ultra | iPhone 16 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 50MP LYT 828 | 50MP LYT 828 | 200MP HP2 | 48MP |
| Periscope | 200MP (3.5x) | 200MP (3x) | 50MP (5x) | 12MP (5x) |
| Battery | 6510mAh | 7500mAh | 5000mAh | 4685mAh |
| Portrait Modes | Excellent (Multiple styles) | Very Good | Good | Good |
| Video Features | 8K, 4K 120fps | 4K 120fps | 8K | 4K 120fps ProRes |
| Price | ₹89,999 | ₹99,999 | ₹1,29,999 | ₹1,44,900 |
Both Vivo and Oppo offer better value compared to Samsung and Apple flagships while matching or exceeding camera performance in many scenarios.
Price & Variants in India
Vivo X300 Pro
| Variant | Price |
|---|---|
| 12GB + 256GB | ₹89,999 |
| 16GB + 512GB | ₹99,999 |
Availability: Flipkart, Vivo India website, offline retail stores
Oppo Find X9 Pro
| Variant | Price |
|---|---|
| 12GB + 256GB | ₹99,999 |
| 16GB + 512GB | ₹1,09,999 |
Availability: Amazon, Flipkart, Oppo India website, offline stores
Bank offers and exchange discounts can reduce effective prices by ₹5,000-₹10,000
Who Should Buy This Phone?
Buy Vivo X300 Pro If You:
- Want the best portrait photography experience
- Need advanced video features (8K, portrait video 4K 60fps)
- Prioritize gaming performance over thermals
- Want longer software support (7 years security updates)
- Are a photography enthusiast or content creator
Buy Oppo Find X9 Pro If You:
- Need maximum battery life (power users, travelers)
- Prefer a stable, bug-free software experience
- Want a more balanced overall flagship experience
- Prefer modern, flatter design
- Don’t need extreme camera features but want excellent quality
Skip Both If You:
- Have a strict budget under ₹70,000
- Don’t prioritize camera quality
- Need compact phones (both are large devices)
FAQs
Vivo X300 Pro is better for portraits, HDR, video features, and zoom photography. Oppo captures more detail by default and has improved significantly, but Vivo remains more consistent overall.
Oppo Find X9 Pro with its 7500mAh battery offers significantly better battery life compared to Vivo’s 6510mAh battery.
Yes, it delivers higher average FPS in demanding games like Genshin Impact (59.2 FPS) but runs hotter than Oppo.
ColorOS on Oppo is currently more stable and smoother. Origin OS has improved but still shows occasional bugs.
Yes, both phones support all major 5G bands available in India.
Vivo X300 Pro at ₹89,999 offers better value with superior camera features. Oppo at ₹99,999 is pricier but offers better battery and software stability.
For photography enthusiasts, yes. Vivo’s kit offers better functionality while Oppo’s kit includes tripod mount support.
Oppo Find X9 Pro offers better long-term reliability due to stable software and larger battery. Vivo offers longer update support (7 years vs 6 years security updates).
Final Verdict
After extensive testing, here’s the honest conclusion:
Vivo X300 Pro is the better camera phone – it offers superior HDR, excellent portraits with multiple artistic effects, better zoom performance, and more video features including 8K recording.
Oppo Find X9 Pro is the better balanced flagship – it delivers excellent camera quality (very close to Vivo), massive battery life, stable software experience, and modern design.
Buying Recommendation
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Pure camera phone buyer | Vivo X300 Pro ✓ |
| Balanced flagship experience | Oppo Find X9 Pro ✓ |
| Battery life priority | Oppo Find X9 Pro ✓ |
| Content creators/photographers | Vivo X300 Pro ✓ |
| Software stability priority | Oppo Find X9 Pro ✓ |
| Value for money | Vivo X300 Pro ✓ |
Final Word: If camera is your primary concern, buy Vivo X300 Pro. If you want an all-round excellent flagship with unmatched battery life, choose Oppo Find X9 Pro. Both are exceptional phones, and you won’t be disappointed with either choice.
For more smartphone comparisons, reviews, and tech news, stay connected with Techzing.in